Catholics for Kerry

Sunday, December 12, 2004

Kerry Calls For Different Abortion Speak from Democrats

[Democrats have done a good job stressing their belief that a free and just society should be a pro-choice society. The failure of communication compounded by the lies and hypocrisy of the Right is that Democrats have not communicated clearly that we do not like nor approve of abortion, we actually do want to reduce and solve the abortion problem and that pro-life and pro-choice are not mutually exclusive.]

MSNBC.com
Anxiety Over Abortion
Pro-choice Democrats eye a more restrictive approach to abortion as one way to gain ground at the polls

By Debra Rosenberg
Newsweek


Dec. 20 issue - The week after Thanksgiving, dozens of Democratic Party loyalists gathered at AFL-CIO headquarters for a closed-door confab on the election. John Kerry dropped by to thank members of the liberal 527 coalition America Votes. When Ellen Malcolm, president of the pro-choice political network EMILY's List, asked about the future direction of the party, Kerry tackled one of the Democrats' core tenets: abortion rights. He told the group they needed new ways to make people understand they didn't like abortion. Democrats also needed to welcome more pro-life candidates into the party, he said. "There was a gasp in the room," says Nancy Keenan, the new president of NARAL Pro-Choice America.

It might have sounded shocking, but John Kerry isn't alone in taking a new look at how the party is handling the explosive topic of abortion. As Democratic strategists and lawmakers quietly discuss how to straddle the nation's Red-Blue divide, abortion has become a prime target. "The issue and the message need to be completely rethought," says one strategist. Along with gay marriage, abortion is at the epicenter of the culture wars, another example used by Republicans to highlight the Democrats' supposed moral relativism. Polls show that most Americans support legal abortion, yet they also favor some restrictions, particularly after the first trimester. Strategists say that's where many Democrats are, too—the public just doesn't know it. With pro-life Sen. Harry Reid newly installed as Senate minority leader, Democrats are eager to show off their big tent.

No one's suggesting that the party abandon its pro-choice roots. With George W. Bush expected to nominate as many as three presumably pro-life Supreme Court justices this term, advocates worry that the right to an abortion is more imperiled than it's been in decades. But as a step toward ultimately preserving that basic right, some Democrats now favor embracing common-sense restrictions on it. One possible initiative: a bill banning third-trimester abortions with broad exceptions for the life and health of the mother.

Democratic lawmakers have found themselves boxed in by a pro-choice orthodoxy that fears the slippery slope—the idea that allowing even the smallest limitation on abortion only paves the way for outlawing it altogether. As a result, most Democrats opposed popular measures like "Laci and Conner's Law"—which makes it a separate federal crime to kill a fetus—and a ban on the gruesome procedure called partial-birth abortion.

A small group of pro-choice Democrats—mostly from Red States—bucked that trend, voting for one or both measures. Still, the issue is so thorny that nearly every lawmaker contacted by NEWSWEEK declined to discuss those votes or the topic in general. But a handful of those senators—including Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu, Arkansas Sens. Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor, and Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh—have joined a new progressive advocacy group, Third Way, that hopes to move the party to the center on a number of cultural issues, including abortion. The effort is headed by a team of strategists who helped the Dems find middle ground on gun safety.

It's clear that challenging the old orthodoxy won't be easy. Many advocates blame Kerry for not talking about abortion enough—especially the fate of the Supreme Court. "He did not help the cause," says Planned Parenthood president Gloria Feldt. Other pro-choicers worry that changing gears on abortion will look like flip-flopping. "If we try to be fake Republicans, that's not going to work," says Colorado Rep. Diana DeGette, co-chair of the House pro-choice caucus. "It would be a cynical political move." But some moderate pro-choicers already have voting records to back up their convictions. That's proof, strategists say, that they don't have to choose between values and votes.

© 2004 Newsweek, Inc.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6700571/site/newsweek/

4 Comments:

  • Planned Parenthood...NARAL "Pro-Choice America" and ACLU would give up their collective stranglehold on the Democrat Party....And allow a Pro-Life Democrat Presidential Candidate.....As soon as NOW discredits Clinton for Sexually Abusing Women as a Chief Executive

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at December 20, 2004 at 11:10 AM  

  • "There was a gasp in the room," says Nancy Keenan, the new president of NARAL Pro-Choice America.It is ridiculous. The Democrats have shown themselves to be moral degenerates on the issue, time and again. Clinton actually vetoing the partial birth abortion bill. There are others who actually quibble over the very words that describe it. Of course, it is what it is. It is the abortion of a partially born baby. What else are people supposed to call it? Why hide in the words?

    The Democrats have been moral degenerates on this issue for quite some time and then they combine it with other decadence in the decline of civlization. People get this. They also get the fact that Democrats want the judiciary to make all their discriminations for them.

    So Democrats keep losing and Zell Miller writes a book that predicts it, a National Party No More.

    Of course, and it does not take a genius to see why. Even Kerry can see it.

    The Founding Fathers saw the problem,
    Political Philosophers and Their Malcontents

    By Blogger mynym, at December 20, 2004 at 11:26 AM  

  • Get 1000s of Links pointing back to Your Site... Starting Today!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at October 27, 2005 at 11:23 PM  

  • to all of the major RSS feed directories on the Internet.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at November 6, 2005 at 8:14 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home